| Title |
Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast microbubbles: theory and in vivo measurements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, October 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00079-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flemming Forsberg, Rahguveer Basude, Ji-Bin Liu, John Alessandro, William T. Shi, Nandkumar M. Rawool, Barry B. Goldberg, Margaret A. Wheatley |
| Abstract |
Two surfactant-based contrast agents, ST44 and ST68, were produced according to US Patent # 5,352,436 and filled with either air, C4F10 (perfluorobutane) or SF6 (sulfur hexaflouride). Ten rabbits received i.v. injections of each agent/gas combination with 5 repetitions of each dose (range: 0.005-0.13 mL/kg). A custom-made 10-MHz cuff transducer was placed around the surgically exposed distal aorta and audio Doppler signals were acquired in vivo. Quantitative in vivo dose responses were calculated off-line using spectral power analysis and compared to a theoretical model of microbubble dissolution and enhancement. For qualitative comparisons, 10 rabbits were imaged pre- and postcontrast administration (dose: 0.1 mL/kg) in gray-scale and colour. All agent/gas combinations produced marked Doppler enhancement with air bubbles enhancing least of all (p < 0.0001) and ST68-SF6 best of all (maximum: 27.6 +/- 2.04 dB; p < 0.012). There were no significant differences between other agent/gas combinations (0.30 < p < 0.70). Theoretical enhancement was within 1 order of magnitude of the experimental observations (i.e., deviations of up to 10 dB). The duration of contrast enhancement was 1-2 min for air-filled bubbles, 3-5 min for SF6-filled bubbles and more than 7 min for C4F10-filled bubbles. In conclusion, ST68-SF6 microbubbles produced most in vivo enhancement of the agent/gas combinations studied. Theory matched the measurements within an order of magnitude. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
| Engineering | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |