↓ Skip to main content

Acetate as a carbon source for hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biotechnology, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acetate as a carbon source for hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria
Published in
Journal of Biotechnology, January 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0168-1656(00)00368-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hydrogen is a clean energy alternative to fossil fuels. Photosynthetic bacteria produce hydrogen from organic compounds by an anaerobic light-dependent electron transfer process. In the present study hydrogen production by three photosynthetic bacterial strains (Rhodopseudomonas sp., Rhodopseudomonas palustris and a non-identified strain), from four different short-chain organic acids (lactate, malate, acetate and butyrate) was investigated. The effect of light intensity on hydrogen production was also studied by supplying two different light intensities, using acetate as the electron donor. Hydrogen production rates and light efficiencies were compared. Rhodopseudomonas sp. produced the highest volume of H2. This strain reached a maximum H2 production rate of 25 ml H2 l(-1) h(-1), under a light intensity of 680 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1), and a maximum light efficiency of 6.2% under a light intensity of 43 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1). Furthermore, a decrease in acetate concentration from 22 to 11 mM resulted in a decrease in the hydrogen evolved from 214 to 27 ml H2 per vessel.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
India 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 252 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 23%
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Master 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 27%
Engineering 39 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 9%
Environmental Science 21 8%
Chemical Engineering 18 7%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#10,918,553
of 31,970,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biotechnology
#2,039
of 4,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,543
of 152,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biotechnology
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,970,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.