↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TH‐AB‐304‐07: A Two‐Stage Signature‐Based Data Fusion Mechanism to Predict Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients with Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Published in
Medical Physics, June 2015
DOI 10.1118/1.4926122
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

For NSCLC radiotherapy, toxicity outcomes such as radiation pneumonitis ≥G2 (RP2) may depend on patients' physical, clinical, biological and genomic characteristics, and on biomarkers measured during the course of radiotherapy. This can include 100s of predictors. To reduce complexity, a two-step, signature-based data fusion mechanism was developed to estimate a relationship between patient specific characteristics and the probability of RP2 in terms of a modifying effect on mean lung dose (MLD). Data came from 82 NSCLC patients, 15 with RP2. Besides MLD, each had 179 predictors including 10 clinical factors (eg, age, gender, KPS), cytokines before (30) and during (30) treatment, microRNAs (49), and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (60). In stage1, cytokines, microRNAs, and SNPs were used to build separate "signatures" via ridge regression. In stage2, a logistic regression predictive model for RP2 was determined in terms of MLD, the other clinical factors, and the signatures using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Leave-one-out cross-validation was conducted. This was all implemented via 'glmnet' in the R programming environment. For stage1, signatures modifying the effect of MLD for cytokine_pre, cytokine_during, microRNA and SNP included 2, 19, 3, 12 important predictors, respectively. For stage2, only the cytokine_during and SNP signatures remained as important modifying effects to MLD. The cross-validated area under curve (AUC) reaches 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.89 based on 2000 stratified bootstrap replicates); significantly better than a null value of 0.50 (p<0.01). As implemented here, the two-stage, signature-based data fusion mechanism approach includes many patient specific measurements in generation of the signatures (a characteristic of ridge regression), then only includes important signatures and other clinical factors for RP2 prediction (a characteristic of LASSO). This potentially more intuitive approach to handling high dimensional predictors could be an important component of decision support for personalized adaptive radiation treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,012,573
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#7,100
of 7,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,018
of 268,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#394
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,887 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.