↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of sample sizes for pooled faecal sampling for detection of Salmonella in pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology & Infection, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimation of sample sizes for pooled faecal sampling for detection of Salmonella in pigs
Published in
Epidemiology & Infection, May 2009
DOI 10.1017/s0950268809002702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 25%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2010.
All research outputs
#12,345,171
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology & Infection
#2,313
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,340
of 148,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology & Infection
#265
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.