↓ Skip to main content

Performance Feedback Increases the Incidence of Handwashing by Staff Following Patient Contact in Intensive Care

Overview of attention for article published in Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses., June 1995
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Performance Feedback Increases the Incidence of Handwashing by Staff Following Patient Contact in Intensive Care
Published in
Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses., June 1995
DOI 10.1016/s1036-7314(95)70256-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thea van de Mortel, Louise Heyman

Abstract

Nosocomial infections affect up to 30% of ICU patients. Although infection rates decline with increasing handwashing frequency, handwashing rates in ICU's are poor. This study investigated the hypotheses that the subjects' profession would not influence, and performance feedback would not increase, the incidence of handwashing post-patient contact. The study involved an initial period of covert observation to record the baseline level of handwashing, followed by a period of overt observation with regular feedback on handwashing performance by means of letters to staff and histograms of the data displayed in the ICU. Handwashing incidence was reassessed 6 months after performance feedback had ceased. Handwashing differed significantly between professions (P = 0.0001). Initially, the incidence of handwashing was highest amongst wardsmen (90%) and lowest amongst Visiting Medical Officers (VMOs) (20%). Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Registered Nurses (RNs), 57% of physiotherapists, 41% of Resident Medical Officers (RMOs) and 35% of radiographers washed their hands after touching patients. With the exception of the wardsmen, there was a trend towards an increased frequency in handwashing in all groups after performance feedback, but the differences were only statistically significant in the VMO and physiotherapist groups (P < 0.001). The improvements were maintained for 6 months after the feedback phase ended in 4 of the 6 groups.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%