↓ Skip to main content

The stress response to ionizing radiation involoves c-Abl-dependent phosphorylation of SHPTP1.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The stress response to ionizing radiation involoves c-Abl-dependent phosphorylation of SHPTP1.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 1996
DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.14.6898
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

c-Abl is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase that is activated by certain DNA-damaging agents. The present studies demonstrate that nuclear c-Abl binds constitutively to the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHPTP1. Treatment with ionizing radiation is associated with c-Abl-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of SHPTP1. The results demonstrate that the SH3 domain of c-Abl interacts with a WPDHGVPSEP motif (residues 417-426) in the catalytic domain of SHPTP1 and that c-Abl phosphorylates C terminal Y536 and Y564 sites. The functional significance of the c-Abl-SHPTP1 interaction is supported by the demonstration that, like c-Abl, SHPTP1 regulates the induction of Jun kinase activity following DNA damage. These findings indicate that SHPTP1 is involved in the response to genotoxic stress through a c-Abl-dependent mechanism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
Switzerland 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 15%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2011.
All research outputs
#12,344,681
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83,656
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,930
of 40,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#355
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.