↓ Skip to main content

Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Coyotes (Canis latrans)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Coyotes (Canis latrans)
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0132203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph W. Hinton, Frank T. van Manen, Michael J. Chamberlain

Abstract

Little information exists on coyote (Canis latrans) space use and habitat selection in the southeastern United States and most studies conducted in the Southeast have been carried out within small study areas (e.g., ≤1,000 km2). Therefore, studying the placement, size, and habitat composition of coyote home ranges over broad geographic areas could provide relevant insights regarding how coyote populations adjust to regionally varying ecological conditions. Despite an increasing number of studies of coyote ecology, few studies have assessed the role of transiency as a life-history strategy among coyotes. During 2009-2011, we used GPS radio-telemetry to study coyote space use and habitat selection on the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina. We quantified space use and 2nd- and 3rd-order habitat selection for resident and transient coyotes to describe space use patterns in a predominantly agricultural landscape. The upper limit of coyote home-range size was approximately 47 km2 and coyotes exhibiting shifting patterns of space use of areas >65 km2 were transients. Transients exhibited localized space use patterns for short durations prior to establishing home ranges, which we defined as "biding" areas. Resident and transient coyotes demonstrated similar habitat selection, notably selection of agricultural over forested habitats. However, transients exhibited stronger selection for roads than resident coyotes. Although transient coyotes are less likely to contribute reproductively to their population, transiency may be an important life history trait that facilitates metapopulation dynamics through dispersal and the eventual replacement of breeding residents lost to mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 21%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 45%
Environmental Science 36 23%
Engineering 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#19,585,192
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#168,788
of 216,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,335
of 267,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,778
of 6,557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.