↓ Skip to main content

Second trimester serum cortisol and preterm birth: an analysis by timing and subtype

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Perinatology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 2,689)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Second trimester serum cortisol and preterm birth: an analysis by timing and subtype
Published in
Journal of Perinatology, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41372-018-0128-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We hypothesized second trimester serum cortisol would be higher in spontaneous preterm births compared to provider-initiated (previously termed 'medically indicated') preterm births. We used a nested case-control design with a sample of 993 women with live births. Cortisol was measured from serum samples collected as part of routine prenatal screening. We tested whether mean-adjusted cortisol fold-change differed by gestational age at delivery or preterm birth subtype using multivariable linear regression. An inverse association between cortisol and gestational age category (trend p = 0.09) was observed. Among deliveries prior to 37 weeks, the mean-adjusted cortisol fold-change values were highest for preterm premature rupture of the membranes (1.10), followed by premature labor (1.03) and provider-initiated preterm birth (1.01), although they did not differ statistically. Cortisol continues to be of interest as a marker of future preterm birth. Augmentation with additional biomarkers should be explored.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 31 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 35 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#350,960
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Perinatology
#30
of 2,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,736
of 330,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Perinatology
#3
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.