↓ Skip to main content

Using phase information in ultrasonic backscatter for in vivo liver analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using phase information in ultrasonic backscatter for in vivo liver analysis
Published in
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, January 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00205-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In recent studies, it has been shown that information about scatterer spacing can be obtained from analyzing the phase of the ultrasound echo from various media. Such information proves to be useful when examining the ultrasonic backscatter from well-organized tissue, such as the liver. By quantifying the deviations in scatterer spacing and/or varying degrees of regularity, conclusions may be drawn about the underlying pathology of the tissue. This paper examines the physical basis of how the scatterer locations affect the phase of the data. Computer simulations were performed that mimic various scattering conditions and that display the effects of differing degrees of regularity, as well as increases in a diffuse random background scattering component. Results of studies on a phantom are also included to investigate and display the phase response under well-controlled scattering conditions. Finally, in vivo data taken from liver scans were analyzed. In this work, it was shown that the phase of the backscattered signal holds valuable information regarding the pathological state of liver tissue. It is suggested that this simple examination of the phase can be refined into a technique to be used as a method to consistently detect the onset of pathological change.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 9%
Canada 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 3 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Physics and Astronomy 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2012.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
#940
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,313
of 101,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.