↓ Skip to main content

Captive rearing affects growth but not survival in translocated juvenile tuatara

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Zoology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Captive rearing affects growth but not survival in translocated juvenile tuatara
Published in
Journal of Zoology, June 2015
DOI 10.1111/jzo.12263
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 49%
Environmental Science 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,194,032
of 28,141,761 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zoology
#2,812
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,909
of 281,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zoology
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,141,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.