Nurses are ideally positioned to recognise and respond to patient deterioration. However, premonitory signs of patient deterioration are often overlooked, not managed, or not communicated in a timely fashion. Education programs aimed at improving nurses' technical and non-technical skills have been developed, however, the outcomes of these educational strategies remain unclear. A quasi-experimental time series design was used in this study to evaluate the impact of a multi-modal education program (DeTER) on acute care nurses' technical and non-technical skill development and recognition and response to patient deterioration. Participants were asked to complete a survey on four occasions: one month prior to commencement of the DeTER program, immediately prior and post workshop attendance and two-three months' post workshop completion. Pre-intervention, data were collected on participants' demographic profile and their responses to the Clinical Emergency Recognition and Response Survey designed by (Buckley and Gordon, 2011). Post intervention these data were collected again and, in addition, respondents were asked to report on their recent experiences of deteriorating patients and report on their confidence in managing these incidents. Sixty staff consented to participate in the study and all completed the surveys at time 2 and 3. In total 32 staff (45%) responded at all time points. Participants included registered nurses (n = 51; 85%), and enrolled nurses (n = 9; 15%), on average they had worked for 10.4 years (sd = 11.1). Participants rated patient advocacy and assertiveness skills as the most useful aspects of the workshop. Recognition and response to deteriorating patients by ward nurses is a multifaceted process influenced by many factors. Our study supports the importance of multimodal educational strategies in sustaining changes to ward nurses' technical and non-technical skills over time.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,157,735
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Nurse Education in Practice
#50
of 1,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,608
of 371,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nurse Education in Practice
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
