↓ Skip to main content

Targeted gene expression without a tissue-specific promoter: Creating mosaic embryos using laser-induced single-cell heat shock

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Targeted gene expression without a tissue-specific promoter: Creating mosaic embryos using laser-induced single-cell heat shock
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 1997
DOI 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6255
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have developed a method to target gene expression in the Drosophila embryo to a specific cell without having a promoter that directs expression in that particular cell. Using a digitally enhanced imaging system to identify single cells within the living embryo, we apply a heat shock to each cell individually by using a laser microbeam. A 1- to 2-min laser treatment is sufficient to induce a heat-shock response but is not lethal to the heat-shocked cells. Induction of heat shock was measured in a variety of cell types, including neurons and somatic muscles, by the expression of beta-galactosidase from an hsp26-lacZ reporter construct or by expression of a UAS target gene after induction of hsGAL4. We discuss the applicability of this technique to ectopic gene expression studies, lineage tracing, gene inactivation studies, and studies of cells in vitro. Laser heat shock is a versatile technique that can be adapted for use in a variety of research organisms and is useful for any studies in which it is desirable to express a given gene in only a distinct cell or clone of cells, either transiently or constitutively, at a time point of choice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Austria 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 78 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Master 11 13%
Professor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2012.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83,655
of 118,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,907
of 42,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#351
of 522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.