↓ Skip to main content

Role of the Transporter-Like Sensor Kinase CbrA in Histidine Uptake and Signal Transduction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bacteriology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Role of the Transporter-Like Sensor Kinase CbrA in Histidine Uptake and Signal Transduction
Published in
Journal of Bacteriology, July 2015
DOI 10.1128/jb.00361-15
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

CbrA is an atypical sensor kinase found in Pseudomonas: the autokinase domain is connected to a putative transporter of the sodium:solute symporter family (SSSF). CbrA functions together with its cognate response regulator CbrB and plays an important role in nutrient acquisition, including regulation of hut genes for the utilization of histidine and its derivative urocanate. Here we report a genetic and biochemical analysis of CbrA with focus on the function of the putative transporter domain. The work was initiated with mutagenesis of histidine uptake proficient strains to identify histidine-specific transport genes located outside of the hut operon. Genes encoding transporters were not identified, but mutations were repeatedly found in cbrA. This, coupled with [(3)H]histidine transport assays and further mutagenesis, implicated CbrA in histidine uptake. In addition, mutations in different regions of the SSSF domain abolished signal transduction. Site-specific mutations were made at four conserved residues: W55 and G172 (SSSF domain), H766 (H-box) and N876 (N-box). Mutations W55G, G172H and N876G compromised histidine transport, but had minimal effects on signal transduction. The H766G mutation abolished both transport and signal transduction, but capacity to transport histidine was restored upon complementation with a transport-defective allele of CbrA, most likely due to interdomain interactions. Our combined data implicate the SSSF domain of CbrA in histidine transport and suggest that transport is coupled to signal transduction.IMPORTANCENutrient acquisition in bacteria typically involves membrane-bound sensors that via cognate response regulators determine the activity of specific transporters. However, nutrient perception and uptake are often-coupled processes. Thus, from a physiological perspective it would make sense for systems to have evolved that couple the process of signaling and transport within a single protein and where transport is itself the stimulus that precipitates signal transduction. The CbrA regulator in Pseudomonas represents a unique type of sensor kinase whose autokinase domain is connected to a transporter domain. We present genetic and biochemical evidence that suggests that CbrA plays a dual role in histidine uptake and sensing, and that transport is dependent on signal transduction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 37%
Researcher 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 32%
Computer Science 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bacteriology
#15,178
of 16,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,219
of 276,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bacteriology
#37
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,901 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.