↓ Skip to main content

Altered branching of serotonin-containing neurons in Drosophila mutants unable to synthesize serotonin and dopamine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, August 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Altered branching of serotonin-containing neurons in Drosophila mutants unable to synthesize serotonin and dopamine
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, August 1989
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.09-08-02866.1989
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The anatomy of peripheral serotonin-containing fibers (5-HT fibers) in the gut of wild-type Drosophila larvae was compared to mutants deficient in the gene that encodes the enzyme dopa decarboxylase (DfDdc mutants). The 5-HT fibers, located in the proventriculus and midgut, were visualized immunocytochemically by using a monoclonal antibody against 5-HT. Since DfDdc larvae are devoid of 5-HT and dopamine in the nervous system, the highly selective uptake capability of 5-HT neurons was used to visualize the 5-HT fibers. We found that the absence of 5-HT and dopamine in the nervous system of DfDdc animals does not prevent 5-HT fibers from reaching their appropriate targets. However, these fibers in the mutant show a 2-fold increase in the extent of branching. This effect is specific to 5-HT fibers, since glutamate-like and FMRFamide-like immunoreactive fibers of the proventriculus and midgut remain unaffected in the mutant. Low but detectable levels of dopamine and 5-HT in the CNS are sufficient to prevent the increase in arborization, as indicated by analyses of a temperature-sensitive Ddc allele (Ddcts2), which has very low dopa decarboxylase activity. The abnormally extensive branching of 5-HT fibers also can be partially rescued by feeding DfDdc larvae with dopamine. In contrast, feeding with a 5-HT-containing diet had no effect on the mutant phenotype. Hypotheses that could explain the mutant phenotype are proposed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 2 4%
Uruguay 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 38 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 33%
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 53%
Neuroscience 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,356,702
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#13,285
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,603
of 20,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.