Natural mechanical stimulation of the brainstem area by the blood pressure waves propagating in the adjacent arteries plays an important role in the homeostasis of the brainstem centers of cardiovascular control. However, effects of direct mechanical stimulation of this area on the cardiac elecrophysiology have never been studied in humans. In 12 patients (age: 54 +/- 13 years, 5 females) undergoing microvascular decompression, the left (9 patients) or the right (3 patients) side of the ventro-lateral surface of the medulla oblongata was exposed during the surgery, and a mechanical stimulation (duration: 1 min, frequency: 1-2 Hz) of the roots of the cranial nerves and the surface of the brainstem was performed at 3-7 sites using a 2-mm metallic ball. Spatial changes in cardiac repolarization were examined using the 32-lead/192 site electrocardiographic body surface potential maps. Blood pressure was monitored using intra-arterial line. The intervals between the onset of the Q-wave and the offset of the T-wave (QTe) and between the onset of the Q-wave and the peak of the T-wave (QTp), the activation-recovery intervals (ARi), the peak T-wave amplitude, and the QRS and STT integrals were measured using custom software. During the stimulation between the caudal rootlets of the 10th nerve, the peak T-wave amplitude decreased 22% (range: 6-50%) and RR-intervals decreased from 923 +/- 190 to 794 +/- 111 ms compared to the recordings obtained before the stimulation (P =.025 and.063, respectively), whereas QTe, QTp, Ari, and the QRS- and the STT-integrals did not change. Decreased T-wave amplitudes and unchanged QT-intervals suggest that brainstem stimulation might evoke spatially inhomogenious repolarization changes. Stimulation of a localized region surrounding the caudal rootlets of the 10th nerve elicits pronounced effects on cardiac rhythm and repolarization.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Electrocardiology
#760
of 1,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,452
of 55,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Electrocardiology
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
