↓ Skip to main content

Molecular interactions in collagen and chitosan blends

Overview of attention for article published in Biomaterials, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular interactions in collagen and chitosan blends
Published in
Biomaterials, February 2004
DOI 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00595-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Molecular interactions between collagen and chitosan (CC) have the potential to produce biocomposites with novel properties. We have characterised the molecular interactions in CC complexes by viscometry, wide angle X-ray scattering and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. It was found that CC are miscible at the molecular level and exhibit interactions between the components; X-ray diffraction of CC blends indicate that the collagen helix structure is lost in CC films with increasing chitosan content. Non-linear viscometic behaviour with decreasing chitosan content is interpreted as evidence of a third structural phase formed as a complex of CC. The blending of collagen with chitosan gives the possibility of producing new bespoke materials for potential biomedical applications.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 298 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 14%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 81 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 39 13%
Chemistry 37 12%
Engineering 35 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 5%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 101 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,699,124
of 31,634,113 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials
#1,917
of 12,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,144
of 189,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials
#14
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,634,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.