↓ Skip to main content

MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY OF LOWER-EXTREMITY ARTERIAL DISEASE

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Clinics of North America, August 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY OF LOWER-EXTREMITY ARTERIAL DISEASE
Published in
Surgical Clinics of North America, August 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70332-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Improvements in vascular technique have expanded the treatment options for patients with severe occlusive peripheral vascular disease. The decision to perform a major revascularization procedure in patients who are often at high risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality depends on the risk-benefit ratio. Detailed and accurate vascular imaging is essential and evaluating the likelihood of a successful revascularization with subsequent limb salvage. Although contrast angiography has been the time-honored reference standard imaging technique, the method is an invasive procedure with limitations and risks. MRA is a new, noninvasive vascular imaging technique that may now be added to the imaging options with the potential for improved sensitivity for finding patent runoff vessels, avoidance of morbidity, and cost equivalent to that of conventional contrast angiography. Magnetic resonance angiography is a rapidly developing and exciting new vascular imaging technique. As with any new technique, it is imperative that individual centers validate their MRA results and interpretations against the time-honored standard, which continues to be contrast arteriography. Several studies now indicate that MRA can be a cost-effective outpatient imaging technique sufficient for planning and successfully performing peripheral bypass procedures. As developments in hardware, software, and non-nephrotoxic contrast agents continue to increase, applicability of MRA in vascular surgery will continue to expand. Predictably, MRA will have a major role in the future of vascular imaging, and it is likely to supplant the need for conventional contrast angiography in the majority of patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Sports and Recreations 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#9,514,662
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Clinics of North America
#326
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,049
of 35,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Clinics of North America
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them