↓ Skip to main content

Response Bias on Self-Report Measures of Sexual Fantasies Among Sexual Offenders

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Response Bias on Self-Report Measures of Sexual Fantasies Among Sexual Offenders
Published in
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, July 2016
DOI 10.1177/0306624x15593748
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kindra Seifert, Jenna Boulas, Matthew T. Huss, Mario J. Scalora

Abstract

The impact of sexual fantasies in future risk and treatment response among sexual offenders has long been known. However, as we develop objective self-report measures of sexual fantasies, response bias is becoming an increasing concern. In examining a sample of institutionalized sex offenders, the present study suggests that offenders' responses on these measures are prone to response bias, the bias does not negate their associations with other self-report measures of sexual deviance, and relationship of their sexual fantasies does not appear to relate to actual behavioral indications. Clinical and research implications for these findings are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 57%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,481,391
of 26,239,416 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
#658
of 1,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,816
of 344,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
#128
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,239,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.