Arthrodesis is generally the most accepted surgical option for treatment of degenerative and traumatic conditions involving the distal interphalangeal joint of the fingers or the interphalangeal joint of the thumb. Ideal position of arthrodesis is thought to be slightly flexed to improve power, fine pinch, and grip. Different techniques have been described for distal finger joint arthrodesis, with most surgeons using straight intramedullary implants that obligate the joint to be positioned in neutral extension. In this article, we describe the operative technique to perform a distal finger joint arthrodesis in slight flexion using dorsal plate fixation. We also discuss a case of a patient with distal finger joint arthrodesis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#27,738,494
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hand Surgery - American Edition
#3,726
of 4,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,099
of 374,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hand Surgery - American Edition
#83
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
