↓ Skip to main content

Nitrogenase expression in estuarine bacterioplankton influenced by organic carbon and availability of oxygen

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Microbiology Letters, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nitrogenase expression in estuarine bacterioplankton influenced by organic carbon and availability of oxygen
Published in
FEMS Microbiology Letters, July 2015
DOI 10.1093/femsle/fnv105
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The genetic capacity to fix gaseous nitrogen (N) is distributed among diverse diazotrophs belonging to the Bacteria and Archaea. However, only a subset of the putative diazotrophs present actively fix N at any given time in the environment. We experimentally tested whether the availability of carbon and inhibition by oxygen constrain N fixation by diazotrophs in coastal seawater. The goal was to test whether by alleviating these constraints an increased overlap between nitrogenase (nifH)-gene- carrying and -expressing organisms could be achieved. We incubated water from a eutrophic but N-limited fjord in Denmark under high carbon/low oxygen conditions and determined bacterial growth and production, diazotrophic community composition (Illumina nifH amplicon sequencing), and nifH gene abundance and expression (quantitative PCR (qPCR) and quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR)). Bacterial abundances and production increased under high carbon/low oxygen conditions as did the similarity between present and active diazotrophic communities. This was caused by the loss of specific abundant yet non-active gammaproteobacterial phylotypes and increased expression by others. The prominent active gamma- and epsilonproteobacterial diazotrophs did not, however, respond to these conditions in a uniform way, highlighting the difficulty to assess how a change in environmental conditions may affect a diverse indigenous diazotrophic community.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 26%
Environmental Science 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#5,266
of 5,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,811
of 276,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.