↓ Skip to main content

Macular Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer: Automated Detection and Thickness Reproducibility with Spectral Domain–Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Macular Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer: Automated Detection and Thickness Reproducibility with Spectral Domain–Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma
Published in
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, October 2011
DOI 10.1167/iovs.11-7962
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To demonstrate the capability of SD-OCT to measure macular retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness and to assess its reproducibility in glaucomatous eyes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 180 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Master 17 9%
Other 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 45 24%
Unknown 55 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 46%
Engineering 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Computer Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 60 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,230,358
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#2,093
of 8,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,486
of 160,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
#27
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.