↓ Skip to main content

Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol in Children With Autistic Disorder: An Open Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol in Children With Autistic Disorder: An Open Pilot Study
Published in
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, August 2001
DOI 10.1097/00004583-200108000-00009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Conventional neuroleptics ameliorate symptoms in children with autistic disorder; however, they are known to cause dyskinesias. Atypical neuroleptics, including olanzapine, may have less risk for dyskinesia, but their efficacy in autistic disorder is not established. This study was designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of open-label olanzapine as a treatment for children with autistic disorder by using haloperidol as a standard comparator treatment. In a parallel groups design, 12 children with DSM-IV autistic disorder (mean age 7.8+/-2.1 years) were randomized to 6 weeks of open treatment with olanzapine or haloperidol. Mean final dosages were 7.9+/-2.5 mg/day for olanzapine and 1.4+/-0.7 mg/day for haloperidol. Outcome measures included the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) and the Children's Psychiatric Rating Scale (CPRS). Both groups had symptom reduction. Five of six in the olanzapine group and three of six in the haloperidol group were rated as responders according to the CGI Improvement item. Subjects showed improvement on the CPRS Autism Factor (F1,9 = 24.4, p = .0008). Side effects included drowsiness and weight gain. The findings suggest that olanzapine is a promising treatment for children with autistic disorder. Further placebo-controlled and long-term studies of olanzapine in autistic disorder are required.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Psychology 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#9,515,244
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#2,539
of 4,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,539
of 45,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.