↓ Skip to main content

Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2015.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2015.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), July 2015
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0102
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the 2015 NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck (H&N) Cancers. These Insights describe the different types of particle therapy that may be used to treat H&N cancers, in contrast to traditional radiation therapy (RT) with photons (x-ray). Research is ongoing regarding the different types of particle therapy, including protons and carbon ions, with the goals of reducing the long-term side effects from RT and improving the therapeutic index. For the 2015 update, the NCCN H&N Cancers Panel agreed to delete recommendations for neutron therapy for salivary gland cancers, because of its limited availability, which has decreased over the past 2 decades; the small number of patients in the United States who currently receive this treatment; and concerns that the toxicity of neutron therapy may offset potential disease control advantages.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#11,319,101
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#1,181
of 2,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,025
of 301,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.