↓ Skip to main content

Effects of workers’ interpersonal helping behavior enhancement program

Overview of attention for article published in Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of workers’ interpersonal helping behavior enhancement program
Published in
Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health, July 2015
DOI 10.1539/sangyoeisei.b15001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuji Horita, Yasumasa Otsuka

Abstract

Interpersonal helping behavior in organizational citizenship behavior can enhance social support in the workplace. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a workers' interpersonal helping behavior enhancement program increased interpersonal helping behavior, social support, and quantitative workload, and reduced psychological stress responses. A total of 72 workers in a manufacturing company in Japan participated in this study. After excluding 24 participants due to incomplete answers to a questionnaire, retirement, or absence from training, a total of 26 participants working in branch B assigned to an intervention group (22 male and 4 female) and a total of 22 participants working in branch C assigned to a control group (19 male and 3 female) were used for per-protocol analyses. In addition, after excluding 10 participants due to incomplete answers at pre-test, a total of 35 participants working in branch B assigned to an intervention group (30 male and 5 female) and a total of 27 participants working in branch C assigned to a control group (23 male and 4 female) were used for intention to treat (ITT) analyses. Interpersonal helping behavior was assessed using the Japanese version of the Organizational Citizenship Behavior Scale. The Brief Job Stress Questionnaire was used to measure quantitative workload, psychological stress responses, and social support. Only the intervention group participants attended a seminar on psychological education, performed role-playing, and did four weeks' homework (HW). Both the intervention and control group participants answered pre-test (pre), post-test (post), and follow-up test (follow-up) at the same times. To evaluate the effects of the workers' interpersonal helping behavior enhancement program, two-way analysis of variances were performed for per-protocol analyses. Interpersonal helping behavior, quantitative workload, psychological stress responses, and social support were used as the dependent variables, time (pre, post, follow-up) and group (intervention, control) were used as the independent variables. A linear mixed model was established for ITT analyses. The post and follow-up scores of interpersonal helping behavior and coworker support were significantly higher than the pre scores in per-protocol analyses. However, the follow-up scores of coworker support were not significantly higher than the pre scores in the ITT analyses. The workers' interpersonal helping behavior enhancement program significantly improved interpersonal helping behavior and coworker support. However, the scores of supervisor support, quantitative workload, and psychological stress responses did not change significantly. The workers' interpersonal helping behavior enhancement program may enhance interpersonal helping behavior and coworker support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Other 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#184
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,977
of 277,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sangyō eiseigaku zasshi Journal of occupational health
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.