↓ Skip to main content

Neonatal Resuscitation beyond the delivery room – Does one protocol fit all?

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Paediatrica, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neonatal Resuscitation beyond the delivery room – Does one protocol fit all?
Published in
Acta Paediatrica, August 2015
DOI 10.1111/apa.13116
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The complex physiological events that occur during the transition from fetal to extra-uterine life justify special consideration. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) algorithm was developed to provide a basic approach that was readily translatable to a broad range of professionals engaged in delivery room resuscitative efforts. Since its introduction, the use of the NRP algorithm has extended beyond its original application in the delivery room to its use in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), but without any research on its scientific merit or formal evaluation of its impact. Resuscitation beyond the delivery room is sometimes multifactorial, it is often unpredictable and there is a risk that healthcare staffs are not always well prepared. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,210,175
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Acta Paediatrica
#3,485
of 5,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,326
of 269,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Paediatrica
#26
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.