↓ Skip to main content

Transplantation in value-based care for patients with renal failure

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Transplantation, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transplantation in value-based care for patients with renal failure
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, May 2018
DOI 10.1111/ajt.14878
Pubmed ID
Authors

On behalf of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons Executive Committee, Osama Gaber, Alan Reed, Timothy Pruett, Jean Emond

Abstract

"Integrating kidney transplantation into value-based care for people with renal failure" (1) advocates expanding the Comprehensive ESRD Care (CEC) initiative to include patients with advanced CKD and kidney transplant recipients. An expanded CEC would essentially function as an ESRD Accountable Care Organization (ACO) to share savings and risk for the ESRD care continuum, and, according to the authors, provide large dialysis organizations financial incentive to use savings to improve care. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 42%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#3,463
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,128
of 341,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#69
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.