↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Thyroid Hormone Receptor Does Not Heterodimerize with the Vitamin D Receptor but Represses Vitamin D Receptor-Mediated Transactivation
Published in
Endocrinology, September 1998
DOI 10.1210/mend.12.9.0165
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The 9,000 Mr calcium-binding protein calbindin-D9k (CaBP9k) is markedly induced by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3] in mammalian intestine. However, although a vitamin D response element (VDRE) has been reported in the promoter of the rat CaBP9k gene (at -490/-472), the CaBP9k promoter is weakly transactivated by 1,25-(OH)2D3. Previous studies indicated that when MCF-7 cells are transfected with the rat CaBP9k VDRE ligated to the thymidine kinase promoter and treated with both 1,25-(OH)2D3 and T3 there is an enhancement of the response observed with 1,25-(OH)2D3 alone, suggesting direct cross-talk between thyroid hormone and the vitamin D endocrine system and activation via the formation of vitamin D receptor (VDR)-thyroid hormone receptor (TR) heterodimers. To determine whether the weak response of the rat CaBP9k natural promoter to 1,25-(OH)2D3 could be enhanced by T3, CaBP9k promoter/reporter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs were transfected in MCF-7 cells, and the cells were treated with the two hormones alone or in combination. No induction with T3 alone and no enhancement of reporter activity in the presence of both hormones was observed. To determine whether a lack of effect by T3 was specific for the CaBP9k promoter and to further examine the possibility of cross-talk between the TR- and VDR-signaling pathways, the 1,25-(OH)2D3-responsive rat 24 hydroxylase [24(OH)ase] promoter and the rat osteocalcin VDRE (-457/-430), both fused to reporter genes were similarly examined in MCF-7 cells. Again, no enhancement of the response to 1,25-(OH)2D3 was observed in the presence of T3. In addition, a similar lack of response to T3 but responsiveness to 1,25-(OH)2D3 was observed when UMR106-01 osteosarcoma cells [which, like MCF-7 cells, express VDR, TR, and the retinoid X receptor (RXR) endogenously] were transfected with a 1,25-(OH)2D3 responsive mouse osteopontin promoter reporter. In vitro DNA binding assays were carried out using purified human VDR, human RXRalpha, and chick T3Ralpha and 24(OH)ase, osteocalcin, osteopontin, and CaBP9k VDRE oligonucleotide probes. No VDR-TR heterodimer binding on any of these VDREs was observed, although, as expected, there was binding by the VDR-RXR complex and strong TR-RXR binding to a consensus thyroid hormone response element. Simultaneous gel retardation assays using similar and lower concentrations of TR with RXR showed strong binding of TR-RXR on a 32P-labeled thyroid response element. Studies using the yeast two-hybrid system also did not provide evidence for the formation of a VDR-TR protein-protein interaction. In addition, in vivo data showed that transfection of TR, in fact, repressed VDR-mediated transcription and that the repression could be reversed by the addition of RXR. Thus, in vitro and in vivo experiments do not support ligand-sensitive transactivation mediated by VDR-TR heterodimer formation but rather suggest that TR expression can repress 1,25-(OH)2D3-induced transcription predominantly by sequestering RXR.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 5 31%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Computer Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#28,747,540
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Endocrinology
#13,400
of 14,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,839
of 46,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrinology
#96
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.