↓ Skip to main content

Hemoperitoneum Score Helps Determine Need for Therapeutic Laparotomy

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hemoperitoneum Score Helps Determine Need for Therapeutic Laparotomy
Published in
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, April 2001
DOI 10.1097/00005373-200104000-00009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sonography provides a fast, portable, and noninvasive method for patient assessment. However, the benefit of providing real-time ultrasound (US) imaging and fluid quantification shortly after patient arrival has not been explored. The objective of this study was to prospectively validate a US hemoperitoneum scoring system developed at our institution and determine whether sonography can predict a therapeutic operation. For 12 months, prospective data on all patients undergoing a trauma sonogram were recorded. All sonograms positive for free fluid were given a hemoperitoneum score. The US score was compared with initial systolic blood pressure and base deficit to assess the ability of sonography to predict a therapeutic laparotomy. Forty of 46 patients (87%) with a US score > or = 3 required a therapeutic laparotomy. Forty-six of 54 patients with a US score < 3 (85%) did not need operative intervention. The sensitivity of sonography was 83% compared with 28% and 49% for systolic blood pressure and base deficit, respectively, in determining the need for therapeutic operation. We conclude that the majority of patients with a score > or = 3 will need surgery. The US hemoperitoneum scoring system was a better predictor of a therapeutic laparotomy than initial blood pressure and/or base deficit.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Saudi Arabia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 75%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%