You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Informatics, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.007 |
| Authors |
Catherine S. Jarnevich, Thomas J. Stohlgren, Sunil Kumar, Jeffery T. Morisette, Tracy R. Holcombe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 370 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 84 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 151 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 103 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 87 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,317,630
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Informatics
#72
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,587
of 279,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Informatics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.