↓ Skip to main content

Clinical risk prediction for pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: development of model in international prospective cohort

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical risk prediction for pre-eclampsia in nulliparous women: development of model in international prospective cohort
Published in
British Medical Journal, April 2011
DOI 10.1136/bmj.d1875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 421 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 64 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 12%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Master 40 9%
Student > Postgraduate 32 7%
Other 81 18%
Unknown 125 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 138 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,283,711
of 34,614,958 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#18,409
of 75,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,858
of 162,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#53
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,614,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.