↓ Skip to main content

Molecular dynamic study of the mechanical properties of two-dimensional titanium carbides Tin+1Cn (MXenes)

Overview of attention for article published in Nanotechnology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular dynamic study of the mechanical properties of two-dimensional titanium carbides Tin+1Cn (MXenes)
Published in
Nanotechnology, June 2015
DOI 10.1088/0957-4484/26/26/265705
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Two-dimensional materials beyond graphene are attracting much attention. Recently discovered 2D carbides and nitrides (MXenes) have shown very attractive electrical and electrochemical properties, but their mechanical properties have not been characterized yet. There are neither experimental measurements reported in the literature nor predictions of strength or fracture modes for single-layer MXenes. The mechanical properties of two-dimensional titanium carbides were investigated in this study using classical molecular dynamics. Young's modulus was calculated from the linear part of strain-stress curves obtained under tensile deformation of the samples. Strain-rate effects were observed for all Tin+1Cn samples. From the radial distribution function, it is found that the structure of the simulated samples is preserved during the deformation process. Calculated values of the elastic constants are in good agreement with published DFT data.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 312 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 19%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 3%
Student > Bachelor 9 3%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 138 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 60 19%
Engineering 33 10%
Chemistry 28 9%
Physics and Astronomy 11 3%
Energy 10 3%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 145 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,688,404
of 28,833,811 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnology
#1,244
of 5,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,910
of 285,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnology
#47
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,833,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.