↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Alternative splicing of fibronectin: a mouse model demonstrates the identity of in vitro and in vivo systems and the processing autonomy of regulated exons in adult mice
Published in
Gene, January 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2003.09.026
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have designed a novel approach using genetically engineered mice to make a systematic study of the EDA exon regulation of the fibronectin gene during development and aging. The genome of the mice was modified either by optimization of the EDA natural splice sites or by deleting the EDA region. The previous in vitro observation that the optimization of the splicing sites leads to constitutive inclusion of the EDA exon was confirmed in our animal model. In fact, all the adult tissues of the genetically modified mice showed only EDA(+) FN mRNA, demonstrating the fidelity of in vitro models, despite of the development- and aging-regulated splicing regulation of the EDA exon, and regardless of the presence of exonic elements described within the exon. This result indicates that the splicing regulatory elements of the EDA exon are dispensable in the presence of consensus splicing sites. Moreover, we demonstrate the autonomy of both the EDB and the IIICS alternatively spliced regions in adult mice lacking regulation of the alternative splicing at the EDA exon. We also show here the tight splicing regulation of all three alternative spliced regions of the FN gene at different time-points during development and aging of mice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 33%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Linguistics 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#9,514,662
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Gene
#3,423
of 11,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,761
of 156,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene
#20
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.