↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in ethics, safety, best practices, and oversight regarding HIT vendors, their customers, and patients: a report of an AMIA special task force

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Challenges in ethics, safety, best practices, and oversight regarding HIT vendors, their customers, and patients: a report of an AMIA special task force
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, November 2010
DOI 10.1136/jamia.2010.008946
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 7%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 109 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 23%
Researcher 14 12%
Other 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Professor 9 7%
Other 33 27%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Computer Science 14 12%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Engineering 8 7%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,303,400
of 28,833,811 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#604
of 3,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,597
of 122,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,833,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.