You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Studies on Antitumor Substances. III. Syntheses of Bis(methanesulphonylthio)alkanes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1964
|
DOI | 10.1248/cpb.12.1271 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Seigoro Hayashi, Hiroshi Ueki, Seiko Harano, Junko Komiya, Susumu Iyama, Kazunobu Harano, Katsuaki Miyata, Kunihiro Niigata, Yoshiro Yonemura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,770,911
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#533
of 5,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358
of 9,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#6
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.