↓ Skip to main content

Pseudoirreversible Inhibition of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen by Phosphoramidate Peptidomimetics

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
42 patents

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pseudoirreversible Inhibition of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen by Phosphoramidate Peptidomimetics
Published in
Biochemistry, November 2008
DOI 10.1021/bi801883v
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The mode of inhibition for phosphoramidate peptidomimetic inhibitors of prostate-specific membrane antigen was determined by inhibition reversibility experiments. The results revealed that these inhibitors can be classified into three types: pseudoirreversible (compounds 1-3), moderately reversible (compounds 4-9), and rapidly reversible inhibitors (compounds 10 and 11). Representative compounds from each class were further evaluated for their ability to induce cellular internalization of PSMA. Results from these experiments revealed that the pseudoirreversible inhibitor 1 induced the greatest PSMA internalization. The discovery of pseudoirreversible PSMA inhibitors is expected to provide a new avenue of investigation and therapeutic applications for prostate cancer and neurological disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2026.
All research outputs
#4,964,341
of 33,666,858 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#1,953
of 26,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,454
of 144,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#7
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,666,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.