↓ Skip to main content

A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Primary Immune Cells to Dissect Regulatory Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1478 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in Primary Immune Cells to Dissect Regulatory Networks
Published in
Cell, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.059
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Finding the components of cellular circuits and determining their functions systematically remains a major challenge in mammalian cells. Here, we introduced genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 libraries into dendritic cells (DCs) to identify genes that control the induction of tumor necrosis factor (Tnf) by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a key process in the host response to pathogens, mediated by the Tlr4 pathway. We found many of the known regulators of Tlr4 signaling, as well as dozens of previously unknown candidates that we validated. By measuring protein markers and mRNA profiles in DCs that are deficient in known or candidate genes, we classified the genes into three functional modules with distinct effects on the canonical responses to LPS and highlighted functions for the PAF complex and oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) complex. Our findings uncover new facets of innate immune circuits in primary cells and provide a genetic approach for dissection of mammalian cell circuits.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 21 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 1433 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 393 27%
Researcher 371 25%
Student > Master 117 8%
Student > Bachelor 115 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 62 4%
Other 205 14%
Unknown 215 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 489 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 398 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 133 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 97 7%
Engineering 26 2%
Other 106 7%
Unknown 229 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2026.
All research outputs
#709,469
of 34,287,918 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#3,353
of 19,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,452
of 302,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#35
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,287,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.