↓ Skip to main content

RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer site
Published in
Genes & Development, May 2001
DOI 10.1101/gad.875901
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Without the RAD51 strand exchange protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiae cannot repair a double-strand break (DSB) by gene conversion. However, cells can repair DSBs by recombination-dependent, break-induced replication (BIR). RAD51-independent BIR is initiated more than 13 kb from the DSB. Repair depends on a 200-bp sequence adjacent to ARS310, located approximately 34 kb centromere-proximal to the DSB, but does not depend on the origin activity of ARS310. We conclude that the ability of a recombination-induced replication fork to copy > 130 kb to the end of the chromosome depends on a special site that enhances assembly of a processive repair replication fork.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,780,480
of 31,542,270 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#2,191
of 6,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,926
of 55,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#16
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,542,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.