This article critically explores recent trends and transformations in the monitoring and management of sleep in the digital age, taking as its focus the advent of new digital technologies to trace and track the 'sleep of ourselves' far away from the conventional sleep laboratory or clinic. Our argument is situated dually in the history of sleep science and medicine on the one hand, and the rise of new digital forms of so-called self-tracking and mobile health (m-Health) on the other hand. While the recent history of sleep science and medicine may rightly we suggest, in Kroker's terms, be characterised as a concern with the 'sleep of others', a new chapter in this story may well be dawning through the advent of these smart new mobile tools and technologies for mapping, or 'm-apping' as we term it, the 'sleep of ourselves' in the digital age. The problems and prospects this holds are then critically considered - through the interrelated themes of selfhood, sociality and governance - and some preliminary conclusions ventured in this new digital domain.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,788,783
of 31,698,485 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#403
of 2,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,609
of 271,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,698,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
