To evaluate the effects of balloon dilation for idiopathic laryngotracheal stenosis on voice production.
Retrospective review of 10 female patients with idiopathic laryngotracheal stenosis undergoing balloon dilation. Voice outcomes were evaluated by comparing pre- and posttreatment patient-reported, perceptual, aerodynamic, and acoustic parameters. Complete data sets were not available for all subjects; sample size for each parameter is reported with the corresponding result.
Total Voice Handicap Index (VHI) decreased significantly (22.9 ± 13.5 to 6.8 ± 6.5; n = 8; p = .015), as did glottal function index (7.2 ± 4.9 to 1.5 ± 2.0; n = 6; p = .022). No changes were observed in the GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain) scale. Changes in aerodynamic parameters were not statistically significant. Percent jitter decreased (1.32 ± 1.37 to 0.60 ± 0.29; n = 7; P = .078), and fundamental frequency range was preserved (507 ± 325 to 612 ± 281; n = 7; P = .309).
Our sample of patients with idiopathic laryngotracheal stenosis had a mild-moderate dysphonia that improved with balloon dilation. Importantly, adverse effects on voice that can occur with open procedures were not observed. Patient perception of dysphonia improved while fundamental frequency range was maintained and aerodynamic parameters remained within or moved toward the normal range. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate changes in voice production associated with balloon dilation.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#24,996,526
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#1,854
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,239
of 278,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
