↓ Skip to main content

The mosquito Anopheles stephensi limits malaria parasite development with inducible synthesis of nitric oxide

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The mosquito Anopheles stephensi limits malaria parasite development with inducible synthesis of nitric oxide
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 1998
DOI 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5700
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have discovered that the mosquito Anopheles stephensi, a natural vector of human malaria, limits parasite development with inducible synthesis of nitric oxide (NO). Elevated expression of A. stephensi NO synthase (NOS), which is highly homologous to characterized NOS genes, was detected in the midgut and carcass soon after invasion of the midgut by Plasmodium. Early induction is likely primed by bacterial growth in the blood meal. Later increases in A. stephensi NOS expression and enzyme activity occurred at the beginning of sporozoite release. Circulating levels of nitrite/nitrate, end-products of NO synthesis, were significantly higher in Plasmodium-infected mosquitoes. Dietary provision of the NOS substrate L-arginine reduced Plasmodium infections in A. stephensi. In contrast, dietary provision of a NOS inhibitor significantly increased parasite numbers in infected mosquitoes, confirming that A. stephensi limits Plasmodium development with NO.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 205 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Student > Master 32 15%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 7%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 45 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#12,356,702
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83,733
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,998
of 49,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#419
of 570 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 570 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.