↓ Skip to main content

Incidence and characteristics of vitamin D deficiency rickets in New Zealand children: a New Zealand Paediatric Surveillance Unit study

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Incidence and characteristics of vitamin D deficiency rickets in New Zealand children: a New Zealand Paediatric Surveillance Unit study
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, June 2015
DOI 10.1111/1753-6405.12390
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate the incidence and characteristics of vitamin D deficiency rickets in New Zealand (NZ). Prospective surveillance among paediatricians of Vitamin D Deficiency Rickets was conducted by the New Zealand Paediatric Surveillance Unit (NZPSU) for 36 months, from July 2010 to June 2013, inclusive. Inclusion criteria were: children and adolescents <15 years of age with vitamin D deficiency rickets (defined by low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and elevated alkaline phosphatase levels, and/or radiological rickets). Fifty-eight children with confirmed vitamin D deficiency rickets were identified. Median age was 1.4 (range 0.3-11) years, 47% were male, and 95% of the children were born in NZ; however, the majority of the mothers (68%) were born outside NZ. Overall annual incidence of rickets in children aged <15 years was 2.2/100,000 (95%CI 1.4-3.5); with incidence in those <3 years being 10.5/100,000 (95%CI 6.7-16.6). Skeletal abnormalities, poor growth and motor delay were the most common presenting features, with hypocalcaemic convulsion in 16% of children. Key risk factors identified were: darker skin pigment, Indian and African ethnicity, age <3 years, exclusive breast feeding, and southern latitude, particularly when combined with season (winter/spring). Of the patients reported, none had received appropriate vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D deficiency rickets remains a problem for NZ children. Key risk factors remain similar to those identified in the international literature. Preventative targeted vitamin D supplementation, as per existing national guidelines, was lacking in all cases reported. Vitamin D deficiency rickets is the most significant manifestation of vitamin D deficiency in growing children. To reduce the incidence of this disease among those at high risk, increasing awareness and implementation of current public health policies for targeted maternal, infant and child supplementation are required.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Lecturer 8 7%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 18%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,168,024
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#395
of 2,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,797
of 301,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.