You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expression of negative emotional responses to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake: Analysis of big data from social media
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Psychology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.4992/jjpsy.86.13076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asako Miura, Masashi Komori, Naohiro Matsumura, Kazutoshi Maeda |
| Abstract |
In this article, we investigated the expression of emotional responses to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake by analyzing the frequency of negative emotional terms in tweets posted on Twitter, one of the most popular social media platforms. We focused on differences in time-series variations and diurnal changes between two kinds of disasters: natural disasters (earthquakes and tsunamis) and nuclear accidents. The number of tweets containing negative emotional responses increased sharply shortly after the first huge earthquake and decreased over time, whereas tweets about nuclear accidents showed no correlation with elapsed time. Expressions of anxiety about natural disasters had a circadian rhythm, with a peak at midnight, whereas expressions of anger about the nuclear accident were highly sensitive to critical events related to the accident. These findings were discussed in terms of similarities and differences compared to earlier studies on emotional responses in social media. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 23 | 39% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 95% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,083,794
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#16
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,882
of 360,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.