↓ Skip to main content

Rural‐Urban Differences in Human Papillomavirus‐associated Cancer Trends and Rates

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rural Health, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rural‐Urban Differences in Human Papillomavirus‐associated Cancer Trends and Rates
Published in
Journal of Rural Health, May 2018
DOI 10.1111/jrh.12305
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted disease and a known cause of many cancers. Previous research explored HPV-associated (HPVa) cancer differences by gender or race, but rural-urban differences in rates and trends have received little attention. This study examined rural-urban differences in rates and temporal trends for individual HPVa cancers. The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries public use data set, representing approximately 93% of the US population, was used to calculate age-adjusted incidence rates and rate ratios (RR; 2009-2013) and overall and annual percentage changes (APC; 1995-2013) for HPVa cancers, including cervical carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the vagina, vulva, penis, anus, rectum, and oropharynx. Rural-Urban Continuum Codes were dichotomized into urban (levels 1-3) and rural (4-9). RRs and APC analyses were stratified by cancer site, rurality, gender, and race/ethnicity. Combined HPVa cancers were elevated in rural populations compared to urban (RR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.06-1.09). Rural females had significantly higher rates of cervical, vaginal, vulvar, oropharyngeal, and anal cancer compared to their urban peers, while rural males had higher rates of penile cancer. Many disparities remained after racial/ethnic stratification (eg, white and black rural females were at increased risk of cervical carcinoma). Regarding trends, rural females and males experienced greater rate increases, or smaller rate decreases, overall and by APC, for nearly every cancer site. Rural populations experience consistent disparities in HPVa cancers. Further research should examine contributing behavioral and epidemiological risk factors and interventions to improve HPV vaccination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 32 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 38 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,907,950
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rural Health
#236
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,724
of 375,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rural Health
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.