↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Evolutionary View on Disulfide Bond Connectivities Prediction Using Phylogenetic Trees and a Simple Cysteine Mutation Model
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131792
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Disulfide bonds are crucial for many structural and functional aspects of proteins. They have a stabilizing role during folding, can regulate enzymatic activity and can trigger allosteric changes in the protein structure. Moreover, knowledge of the topology of the disulfide connectivity can be relevant in genomic annotation tasks and can provide long range constraints for ab-initio protein structure predictors. In this paper we describe PhyloCys, a novel unsupervised predictor of disulfide bond connectivity from known cysteine oxidation states. For each query protein, PhyloCys retrieves and aligns homologs with HHblits and builds a phylogenetic tree using ClustalW. A simplified model of cysteine co-evolution is then applied to the tree in order to hypothesize the presence of oxidized cysteines in the inner nodes of the tree, which represent ancestral protein sequences. The tree is then traversed from the leaves to the root and the putative disulfide connectivity is inferred by observing repeated patterns of tandem mutations between a sequence and its ancestors. A final correction is applied using the Edmonds-Gabow maximum weight perfect matching algorithm. The evolutionary approach applied in PhyloCys results in disulfide bond predictions equivalent to Sephiroth, another approach that takes whole sequence information into account, and is 26-29% better than state of the art methods based on cysteine covariance patterns in multiple sequence alignments, while requiring one order of magnitude fewer homologous sequences (103 instead of 104), thus extending its range of applicability. The software described in this article and the datasets used are available at http://ibsquare.be/phylocys.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Belgium 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Lecturer 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#9,626,180
of 33,129,388 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,859
of 219,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,140
of 295,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,399
of 6,760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,129,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.