↓ Skip to main content

The multidimensional impact of total laryngectomy on women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Communication Disorders, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The multidimensional impact of total laryngectomy on women
Published in
Journal of Communication Disorders, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.06.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Based on society's expectations of what defines the norms for what is deemed "masculine" and "feminine", and a propensity for society's members to adhere to these expectations, women may face a unique set of circumstances and pressures following surgical treatment for laryngeal cancer. This is primarily due to the changes that occur to women's physical, psychological, and social functioning when dealing with cancer diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Because of concerns related to physical disfigurement, acoustic and perceptual changes to one's voice, and threat of the psychological sequelae associated with total laryngectomy (TL) (or, the surgical removal of one's voicebox and surrounding structures), there is an increased potential for violation of social expectations that cross these areas of functioning. As such, efforts that seek to better understand the potentially differential impact of TL on women and identify the specific needs they may have leading up to and after such treatment pursuant to contemporary societal expectations are warranted. Thus, this paper provides an examination of the potentially differential impact of TL on women. In addressing this position, this paper examines the unique challenges women may face postlaryngectomy through the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Through the use of the ICF, this paper will provide an expanded perspective related to the interactions between body functioning, active participation in daily activities, and contextual factors that may act as facilitators or barriers to women's societal reintegration secondary to TL. Readers will be able to describe the multiple factors that may contribute to the differential impact of total laryngectomy (TL) on women. More specifically, readers will gain an understanding about women's physical, psychological, and social functioning secondary to TL. This paper also provides readers with exposure to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. This framework provides readers with an expanded perspective related to the interactions between body functioning, active participation in daily activities, and contextual factors that may act as either facilitators or barriers to the societal reintegration of women secondary to TL.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 116 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 44 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Psychology 10 9%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Linguistics 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2015.
All research outputs
#21,949,239
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Communication Disorders
#466
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,256
of 280,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Communication Disorders
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.