↓ Skip to main content

Anticipating Economic Market Crises Using Measures of Collective Panic

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anticipating Economic Market Crises Using Measures of Collective Panic
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131871
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Predicting panic is of critical importance in many areas of human and animal behavior, notably in the context of economics. The recent financial crisis is a case in point. Panic may be due to a specific external threat or self-generated nervousness. Here we show that the recent economic crisis and earlier large single-day panics were preceded by extended periods of high levels of market mimicry-direct evidence of uncertainty and nervousness, and of the comparatively weak influence of external news. High levels of mimicry can be a quite general indicator of the potential for self-organized crises.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Student > Master 17 22%
Other 8 10%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 18%
Computer Science 10 13%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Other 22 28%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2026.
All research outputs
#2,835,289
of 34,334,818 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,550
of 224,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,008
of 280,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#854
of 6,699 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,334,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,699 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.