A unique distinction between surfactant stabilized ultrasound contrast agent ST68 and water (or tissue), is the enhanced ability of the agent to generate non-linear frequencies such as sub-harmonics (f0/2), higher harmonics (2fo, 3fo, 4fo,...), and ultraharmonics (3f0/2, Sf0/2, 7f0/2,...), when insonated with fundamental frequency f0. Currently, second harmonics (2f0) have been predominantly researched, to exploit the diagnostic benefits of the contrast-specific non-linear imaging. However, we found that at normal imaging pressures (100 kPa-1 MPa), ST68 agent-generated second harmonic enhancements dropped to approximately 8 dB at 100 kPa and approximately 2 dB at 1 MPa. Moreover, at these pressures water (or tissue) produced strong second harmonics due to non-linear propagation. Ultraharmonics and sub-harmonics on the other hand, were generated only by the agent, and were not produced due to the non-linear propagation of ultrasound in either water or tissue. Additionally, ultraharmonic (3f0/2) enhancements of approximately 23 dB at 100 kPa, approximately 35 dB at 0.5 MPa and approximately 41dB at 1.1 MPa for ST68-PFC, offer much greater signal to noise ratio than higher harmonics.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasonics
#316
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,007
of 49,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasonics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them
