↓ Skip to main content

Virtual Rehabilitation – Benefits and Challenges*

Overview of attention for article published in Methods of Information in Medicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Virtual Rehabilitation – Benefits and Challenges*
Published in
Methods of Information in Medicine, February 2018
DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1634378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 364 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 17%
Student > Bachelor 56 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 98 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 17%
Engineering 46 12%
Computer Science 39 10%
Psychology 30 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 7%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 121 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,772,511
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Methods of Information in Medicine
#58
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,195
of 439,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods of Information in Medicine
#41
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.