↓ Skip to main content

Tundra be dammed: Beaver colonization of the Arctic

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
59 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tundra be dammed: Beaver colonization of the Arctic
Published in
Global Change Biology, June 2018
DOI 10.1111/gcb.14332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken D. Tape, Benjamin M. Jones, Christopher D. Arp, Ingmar Nitze, Guido Grosse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Other 10 7%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 28%
Environmental Science 39 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 8%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#197,669
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#168
of 6,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,163
of 346,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#5
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.