↓ Skip to main content

24 h Accelerometry: impact of sleep-screening methods on estimates of sedentary behaviour and physical activity while awake

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
24 h Accelerometry: impact of sleep-screening methods on estimates of sedentary behaviour and physical activity while awake
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, July 2015
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2015.1068438
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although accelerometers can assess sleep and activity over 24 h, sleep data must be removed before physical activity and sedentary time can be examined appropriately. We compared the effect of 6 different sleep-scoring rules on physical activity and sedentary time. Activity and sleep were obtained by accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X) over 7 days in 291 children (51.3% overweight or obese) aged 4-8.9 years. Three methods removed sleep using individualised time filters and two methods applied standard time filters to remove sleep each day (9 pm-6 am, 12 am-6 am). The final method did not remove sleep but simply defined non-wear as at least 60 min of consecutive zeros over the 24-h period. Different methods of removing sleep from 24-h data markedly affect estimates of sedentary time, yielding values ranging from 556 to 1145 min/day. Estimates of non-wear time (33-193 min), wear time (736-1337 min) and counts per minute (384-658) also showed considerable variation. By contrast, estimates of moderate-to-vigorous activity (MVPA) were similar, varying by less than 1 min/day. Different scoring methods to remove sleep from 24-h accelerometry data do not affect measures of MVPA, whereas estimates of counts per minute and sedentary time depend considerably on which technique is used.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 30 20%
Sports and Recreations 26 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 40 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#9,839,311
of 33,225,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#2,481
of 4,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,492
of 292,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#54
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,225,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.